Back to Top

Tea Party Tribune

Subscribe to Tea Party Tribune feed
Tea Party and Political News Reporting
Updated: 1 hour 6 min ago

Kevin Jackson Live & Alive on Sean Hannity Tonight 11/22

Wed, 11/22/2017 - 8:09pm

Tune in to Sean Hannity Tonight 11/22 and see Kevin Jackson Live & Alive….. Tell a Liberal Friend…. Be Thankful..
Tea Party Tribune

 

The post Kevin Jackson Live & Alive on Sean Hannity Tonight 11/22 appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Germaine Greer: Transgender women are ‘not women’

Wed, 11/22/2017 - 8:06pm

Germaine Greer talks to Kirsty Wark about her views on transexuality which have had her un-platformed from a talk at Cardiff University.

Source: YouTube.com

The post Germaine Greer: Transgender women are ‘not women’ appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

How Crazy Have Liberals Gone? Here’s What They Say About the US Flag

Wed, 11/22/2017 - 6:10pm

More and more liberal college students are openly acknowledging their hatred for the American flag and what it represents. In a shocking new video, documentary filmmaker Ami Horowitz asks students on the campus of UC Berkeley –one of America’s most left-wing universities- their opinions on the ‘Stars and Stripes,’ and you won’t believe what they have to say.

“Sadly, there’s been a lot of controversy around some of our American symbols, like the national anthem, so I went to UC Berkeley to see what the reaction would be to another national symbol, the American flag,” says Horowitz.

The filmmaker then travels to Berkeley, California; chanting pro-American slogans and asking passing students what they think of the US flag and America in general.

“Greatest country in the world, right?” asks Horowitz.

“No, the complete opposite,” says one student. “It’s the one imperial power right now in the world,” responds another.

“F*** America!” screams one passerby.

In a staggering experiment, the documentarian then hoists the black-flag of ISIS, calling for the end of America and denouncing “western imperialism.” Shockingly, only one student is offended.

“The black flag of ISIS will stand over the White House,” screams Horowitz.

“Good for you man, good for you,” says one student.

Source: SeanHannity.com

The post How Crazy Have Liberals Gone? Here’s What They Say About the US Flag appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation Made 16 References to God; Trump’s, 6; Obama’s, 1

Wed, 11/22/2017 - 4:37pm

In the first proclmation declaring a national day of Thanksgiving, in 1789, President George Washington referenced God 16 times. For comparison, President Donald Trump referenced God 6 times in his recent proclamation, and back in 2016, his last year in office, then-President Barack Obama referenced God once.

In his Oct. 3, 1789 proclamation, President Washington declared November 26, 1789 “to be devoted by the People of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be….”

President Washington, the “father” of our country, further spoke of the “duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor….”

The opening paragraph of President George Washington’s proclamation for Thanksgiving Day, published on Oct. 3, 1789.

The proclamation calls for “a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God.”

The problamation goes on to reference God in several ways, including “his providence,” the “great Lord and Ruler of Nations,” and refernces to God as he, him, his, and, at the end, “the year of our Lord.”

In President Donald Trump’s first “National Day of Thanksgiving” proclamation, for Nov. 23, 2017, he refers to God six times.

He mentions giving “thanks to Almighty God”; thanks “to God for these blessings”; the “Most High God”; we “seek God’s protection”; “thanks to God”; and “in the year of our Lord.”

In his final year as president Barack Obama referenced God only once in his 2016 Thanksgiving proclamation, and then only in the context of “the year of our Lord.”

President Obama did mention “the belief that all of us are created equal,” which comes from the Declaration of Indepencdence, but he did not quote the full sentence, which reads, “We hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The founders made it clear that men and women are created equal and that certain unalienable rights are given to mankind “by their Creator,” i.e., God.

President Barack Obama “pardons” the Thanksgiving turkey at the White House. (YouTube) 

By Michael W. Chapman @CNSnews.com

The post Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation Made 16 References to God; Trump’s, 6; Obama’s, 1 appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Lois Lerner Pulls Move That Will Have Tea Partiers Shaking Their Heads

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 3:16pm

Former IRS official Lois Lerner wants her testimony sealed forever out of fear for her life, according to Fox News.

Lerner and her deputy, Holly Paz, filed a motion as of Thursday requesting that the courts seal their testimonies on the Tea Party targeting case, fearing that the “public dissemination of their deposition testimony would expose them and their families to to harassment and a credible risk of violence and physical harm.”

Check it out:

“Whenever Mss. Lerner and Paz have been in the media spotlight, they have faced death threats and harassment,” the documents stated. “Returning Mss. Lerner and Paz to the media spotlight places them at risk, regardless of what they actually said in those depositions.”

The documents also stated that: “Public exposure will put innocent bystanders, namely Mss. Lerner’s and Paz’s family members (including young children), at risk, too.”

Lerner and Paz cited such remarks as those by Tea Party leader Mark Meckler, who said the suit would “treat the IRS like the criminal thugs they are,” as evidence of the hostile attitude toward the role they played in the controversy.

They stated that public revelation of their testimonies would “renew the threats and harassment.”

The DOJ said as of Monday that both of their testimonies remain sealed at this time.

Source:Mary Kate Knorr @SarahPalinNews.com

 

The post Lois Lerner Pulls Move That Will Have Tea Partiers Shaking Their Heads appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Any Chance Conservatives Will Finally Fight Back?

Tue, 11/21/2017 - 11:48am

(This column was written before the deluge of sexual assault accusations hit the Roy Moore campaign in Alabama. At the time Codevilla’s advice was spot on, now I suppose we can still hope.)

The best moment for conservatives during the Claremont Institute’s panel discussion on “The Resistance and the Violent New Left” came at the end during the question period. An appeaser popped up and asked the panel how can “we” encourage more “leaders” like Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Lisa Murkowski to run for office instead of “embarrassing” candidates like Alabama’s Roy Moore?

His question was met with dead silence from the panel of William Voegeli and Angelo Codevilla (of the Claremont Institute), Michael Walsh (author and media critic) and Henry Olsen (Ethics & Public Policy Center).

After a lengthy pause Codevilla leaned over toward the microphone and observed Moore “hasn’t lost yet” and we can “vote and hope,” which was the conclusion of the optimism portion of the event.

In a single anecdote the audience saw the problem confronting conservatives today. We are assailed from without by, in Codevilla’s words, “a compact ruling class,” — where establishment Republicans are full participants — along with bike–lock swinging members of Antifa functioning as storm troops. While inside the GOP accommodationists and other Quislings want to restore tranquility by electing more politicians whose first instinct is preemptive surrender.

The situation doesn’t appear to hold much possibility for improvement in the panel’s view, in spite of or possibly because of the election of Donald Trump. Codevilla’s opinion is, “The Resistance has convinced itself Trump is a passing phenomenon.” And a brief one at that. “Trump was elected to be revolutionary against the ruling class and GOP establishment, but in office he has equivocated.”

It’s his belief that what he terms the Cold Civil War will continue to heat up.

Live–and–let–live conservatives are confused by the left’s increasing rhetorical and physical violence in what appears to be a Whittaker Chambers’ moment for the right. In sports, when one side appears to completely outclass its opponent, it’s not uncommon for the victor to display good sportsmanship and ease up rather than pad the margin of victory.

Conservatives see a cultural landscape where their moral positions have been routed. And an indifferent Big Government appears impervious to influence by average voters or election results.

Naturally, many conservatives assume they’ve lost. So why all the leftist violence? Isn’t it time to put the all–conference agitators on the bench?

As Mr. Dooley, not on the panel, said, “Politics ain’t bean–bag.”

“Cultural Marxists are sensing a win and it’s a fact movements get more violent the closer they get to ultimate victory,” explains Walsh. Voegeli posits that when a faction thinks it’s only a matter of time before total victory and the assumption of power in a permanent majority, any display of inhibition is a betrayal of the cause.

Furthermore, the left’s violence and the ideology isn’t likely to be coherent. “A [movement] united by impulse is likely to be impulsive,” Voegeli wryly observes.

The bad news for accommodationist Republicans, like the questioner, is when the left wins there aren’t likely to be many prisoners taken, ideological or otherwise. Academia’s cultural Marxists are marinated in aggressive outrage and moral arrogance. “The Left is taught they’re inherently superior,” Codevilla said.  And as ideologically superior beings, those who disagree are by default intellectual sub–humans with all the tender care and feeding the sub–human label encompasses.

Adapting to the left’s views is going to be difficult if not impossible for principled conservatives, although Lindsay Graham and John McCain may offer conversion therapy.

Olsen says the left defines America as “individual freedom. Anything that stands between desire and its fulfillment is null and void.” This leftist definition of America is intensely personal and subject to abrupt change (Voegeli’s “impulse”), while for conservatives the definition is institutional and relatively fixed. Olsen and Codevilla are united in their belief the differences between left and right are “intractable.”

Consequently, there’s no room for compromise in this ideological fight to the finish. Codevilla warns there are real consequences, “The Resistance expresses the evolving framework of ruling class thought.” The absurd and aggressive ideology one can read with distaste in the HuffPost is a harbinger of the next Democrat administration’s policy. Even Hillary Clinton, according to Codevilla, planned to “crush the deplorables and buy off the pitiables” on her way to victory.

With the exception of Olsen, the panel is united in a belief the left must be confronted and defeated in the street and in the voting booth. Conservatives need leadership, like Trump, that will get in the faces of the left and, not like Trump, be consistent in their opposition.

Walsh in particular has had it, “I can’t emphasize enough what miserable sods these people are. The left is an insane cargo cult of fascists. Until baby boomers are dead you will have no justice and no peace.”

The post Any Chance Conservatives Will Finally Fight Back? appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

RE: The God Hole

Sun, 11/19/2017 - 10:27am

What I’m running into here is what happens when religion is taken to the Nth level. I’m including one of my articles here expanding on that thought.

When I wrote “Joseph Did You Know” I was considering the Mormon Faith’s effect on culture. No one can deny that an abiding

belief doesn’t help people in an adverse situation. I’m always amazed that for people striving for heaven they consistently find places that look like hell to make their stand.

There has to be rules and law if you are to have civilization, but when you begin to drill down on the law, and man serves the law as opposed to the law serving man you get Mormonism, Islam and Southern Baptists.

What I’m up against here in Utah is a system that has evolved to the point that a mere child’s accusation can be taken the full distance from accusations to removal of a child with absolutely no proof and no transparency or rule of law. The only rule is what’s floating around in someone’s head and most of those heads here are Mormon!

Now, I’m not going to debate the merits of Mormonism here because like all organized religion it is simply a manmade corporation originally designed to help a people survive in a desert and evolved into McDonalds, and if that hurts I’m sorry.

Religious debate is saying your invisible guy in the sky can whip someone else’s invisible guy in the sky. It’s like a political debate in a Residential Treatment Center. Medication time!

I intend to form allegiance with groups here in Utah to effect political change and put the rule of law where religious dogma has held sway for almost two centuries. It won’t be easy. The God Hole is hard to heal but if there is a God then He made that hole, and he didn’t intend for it to be filled up with crap!

The God Hole

The post RE: The God Hole appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

This Texas Mall-Owner Offers Shoppers Hope With 10 Commandments Monument

Sun, 11/19/2017 - 5:16am

<script type=”text/javascript” src=”http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=5651183523001&w=566&h=363″></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=”http://video.foxnews.com”>video.foxnews.com</a></noscript>

 

The owner of a mall in Lewisville, Texas, is looking to bring new life to the shopping center. He’s renovating and redecorating and the new centerpiece is an eight-foot tall monument of the Ten Commandments.

“We’re not trying to overwhelm anyone or make a statement. We just believe in the Lord’s love,” owner John Bushman told Dallas News. “That’s the sole reason. We hope when someone sees it, it will touch their heart and give them new hope that day.”

Bushman owns several other businesses in Texas, Colorado and New Mexico–all of them display the Ten Commandments.

He wants the newly named Music City Mall at Vista Ridge to be a “wholesome family place,” that the community sees as a place to gather–whether to watch local musicians perform, take family photos or visit with Santa on Saturdays leading up to Christmas.

The Ten Commandments monument will be on a first floor level in a visible location and Bushman hopes it will be ready and installed within the next few months.

“In times of turbulence in the world,” Bushman said, “we’re sharing peace and the Lord’s love. We all need more of that.”

Source:CBN.com

 

The post This Texas Mall-Owner Offers Shoppers Hope With 10 Commandments Monument appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Bowe Bergdahl – An American Traitor

Sat, 11/18/2017 - 3:50pm

If this deployment is lame I’m just going to walk off into the mountains of Pakistan.”
– Bowe Bergdahl’s words to Specialist Jason Fry, a fellow member of the 25th Infantry Division stationed in Alaska, on his then upcoming deployment to Afghanistan

He arrived at his court martial hearing before Military Judge Col. Jeffery R Nance, regaled in ‘dress blues’…a disgrace to the uniform…a disgrace to his country…and by now we all know his story well…a story that began on the night of June 30, 2009, when then Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl simply disappeared from his patrol base in northern Afghanistan. Captured by the Taliban, Bergdahl was held captive for five years before Barack HUSSEIN Obama traded five Taliban commanders for this one man. Was Bergdahl tortured as he claims and did he try to escape 12 times…some say yes while others say no…but that is not the crux of the issue nor should it mitigate the seriousness of the charges now before him…charges that could see Bergdahl facing up to life in prison.

And with public discourse, banter, and outrage rightfully raising questions as to this man’s allegiances and loyalties; a past president’s illegal negotiations with the enemy; about our country’s commitment never to leave any American troop behind; and about what is just punishment for this, I believe, American traitor…the one thing we must insist on is answers to both why a charge of treason was not levied against him and why the death penalty is not on the table.

Focusing on the fact that Bergdahl walked off his post without authorization thus shirking his assigned duties…a coward by the accounts of most who served with him and a man who they say “liked to spend a bit too much time with the nearby Afghan villagers”…Bergdahl’s actions led directly to the deaths of six of his fellow soldiers*…some husbands, some fathers, some sons, some brothers…six soldiers killed by the enemy while searching for this traitor during a time of war…a “wrongfully caused” search and recovery mission doomed from the start because the man they were searching for did not want to be found. More on that in a bit.

“I don’t understand why we’re trading prisoners at Gitmo for somebody who deserted during a time of war, which is an act of treason,”
said former Sgt. Matt Vierkant, a member of Bergdahl’s platoon on hearing that Bergdahl had been trading for the five Taliban commanders, especially since Obama was pursuing a “negotiated peace” with the Taliban not the needed military victory in Afghanistan.

And so Bowe Bergdahl became the recipient of what Obama called a “confidence-building measure”…never mind that it was an illegal action taken without his consulting Congress…never mind that Obama turned his back on America by negotiated with the enemy…never mind that it was a lopsided prisoner exchange consisting of this one American traitor for five Gitmo-held Taliban commanders…never mind that it was commanders who have since returned to the Afghan theater of war…something Obama knew well they would…just never mind all that for this was a mid-term election year and if this prisoner swap was “handled properly,” as those in his administration said, it could bring a huge mid-term win for Democratic candidates.

A hoped for election gift to the Democrats and a signed, sealed, and delivered gift to the enemy of one Taliban commander for each year Bergdahl was held.

“I understand that leaving was against the law…I had no intention of causing search and recovery operations,”
said Bowe Bergdahl’s at last Monday’s court martial hearing…no intentions of being found by those on our side that is.

So with military prosecutors stating that Bowe Bergdahl committed both the crime of desertion…as per one count of the Uniform Code of Military Justice’s Article 85: leaving one’s post to shirk important or hazardous duties…and one count of Article 99: ‘misbehavior before the enemy’…endangering the safety of a command unit or place…I say why wasn’t it added to the charges that he knowingly and willingly put six fellow soldier’s lives at unnecessary risk because he knew they would come searching for him in known hostile territory.

Unnecessary risk all while Bergdahl claimed that he did what he did with the sole intention of reaching other commanders, drawing attention to what he perceived as leadership and safety issues within his unit…issues he said he could not address with his unit’s higher command…and then returning back to his patrol base. And what were the issues Bergdahl was alluding to…issues that are typical in times of war such as the removing and replacing of officers…duties given…actions taken or not taken…nothing that could not be addressed with his immediate higher ups.

But if by some chance what Bergdahl claims his intention was is indeed true…twisted as it might be…why then did he plead guilty to the charges presented. Now leaving us with important questions that might never be answered, it is possible that Bergdahl’s pleading guilty is what he and his lawyers always had planned to do for maybe this American traitor is hoping for leniency what with the key charge of ‘misbehavior before the enemy’ carrying a maximum penalty of life in prison… what with desertion punishable by up to five years in prison. And with both the prosecution and defense not agreeing to a “stipulation of facts” in the case…an indication they did not reach a deal to limit punishment…leniency…throwing himself on the mercy of the court… might be Bergdahl’s only way out.

One year in prison for desertion for each Taliban commander released with the so serious misbehavior charge matched and then being negated by his five years in captivity…even a traitor and his lawyers can dream can’t they.

American traitors…Bowe Bergdahl is far from the first. Starting with the infamous Benedict Arnold all the way up to Pvt. Eddie Slovak…a World War II U.S. Army soldier and the only American soldier court-martialed and then executed for desertion since the Civil War…now brings up the questions of what does and does not make desertion a charge for execution, and what does the Constitution say about treason itself for without a charge being based upon treason how can desertion be a death penalty charge.

Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution states that, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.” Fair enough in its definition alone.

Continuing with the words, “The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted,” means that upon death the guilty party’s crime is laid to rest with him…as in not being transferred to surviving family members…but Article 3, Section 3 also clearly states that Congress can adjudicate whatever punishment it deems meets a justly tried and convicted traitor’s level of treason.

So with Bergdahl facing up to five years in prison for desertion, and as I write this, a still undetermined number of years for ‘misbehavior before the enemy’..misbehavior as in ‘aiding and abetting’ the Taliban…do Bergdahl’s acts committed meet the definition of treason no matter that he plead guilty to the two charges levied against him. And if the prosecution can prove said charges do meet the Constitutional definition of treason is it enough to get Congress involved in Bergdahl’s sentencing what with the fact being that just because one is given the right to do something does not always mean it will get done. And not getting done is more truth than supposition especially with a sitting Congress who, while holding the Republican majority, is overrun with both Rino’s and obstructionists.

Now as for the charge of desertion itself…do Bowe Bergdahl’s actions meet the criteria for treason and in return a possible sentence of death…I believe they do. And why…because while some defending him say he is a “fragile young man”…a young man who had previously been discharged from the Coast Guard for psychological reasons…as in “adjustment disorder with depression”…the fact is that others have deserted their units during the Iraq and Afghan wars, but what makes Bergdahl’s case different is that he did so while on the battlefield thus deliberately putting his fellow soldiers in harm’s way…sort of like him setting them up to be ‘sitting ducks’…bang bang another American troop dead.

And the blood of those six American troops who comprised the aforementioned search and recovery mission is directly on Bergdahl’s hands for if this coward had not run away to hide in the woods…to take up with the enemy…those six Americans would most probably be alive today.

So Bergdahl’s act of desertion, I believe, does meet the criteria for additional charges of treason to be levied against him for Bergdahl showed deliberate and total disregard for the consequences of his actions as he knowingly brought ‘aid and comfort’ to the enemy…an enemy who relished in the fact that they could now add six more American dead to their mounting body count. And that’s not even counting what many soldiers in Bergdahl’s platoon stated when being interviewed…that enemy attacks…some with casualties… greatly increased against U.S. forces in Paktika province in the days and weeks following Bergdahl’s disappearance…with logic now dictating what if anything did Bergdahl tell his captors that afforded this increase in attacks…where none had been expected…an increase that could only be courtesy of a squealer.

And without the now proven possible charge of treason being added to the desertion charge Bergdahl could face as little as five years in prison…less than even one year for each of the six soldier killed because of his willful actions. So that leaves the charge of ‘misbehavior before the enemy’ to hopefully see justice served, but even that serious charge…a charge one step short of treason and a charge rarely used since World War II…carries with it a maximum punishment of confinement in prison for life. And sadly in Bergdahl’s case that means decades of life lived on our taxpayer dime…monies wasted on a traitor… while six of his fellow soldier’s blood remain forever stained on his hands.

Now I leave you with this and it relates to my earlier ‘more on this in a bit’ in regards to the fact that Bowe Bergdahl never wanted to be found…at least not found by those on our side.

In his last email to his parents, an email sent on June 27, 2009, Bowe Bbergdahl wrote these words, and I quote, “The future is too good to waste on lies and life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be an American. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting. I am sorry for everything here.” Adding that, “These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid, that they have no idea how to live…I am disgusted with the Army.”

And if for no other reason than those shameful words said, Bowe Bergdahl can, in my opinion, either hang by the neck until dead or be riddled with bullets by a firing squad, for not one bloody dime of our taxpayer dollars should ever be wasted keeping this America-apologizing, traitorous stain on our country alive.

Now let true justice be served.
____________________________________
* The six U.S. soldiers killed while looking for Bowe Bergdahl were:
Staff Sergeant Clayton Bowen, 29, of San Antonio, Texas; Private 1st Class Morris Walker, 23, of Chapel Hill, N.C; Staff Sergeant Kurt Curtiss, 27, of Murray, Utah; 2nd Lieutenant Darryn Andrews, 34, of Dallas, Texas; Staff Sergeant Michael Murphrey, 25, of Snyder, Texas; and Private 1st Class Matthew Martinek, 20, of DeKalb, Ill.

By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Copyright @ 2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved

http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2017/10/op-ed-bowe-bergdahl.html

*************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!

Today, Friday, October 20th from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss the American traitor Bowe Bergdahl, the latest line of liberal distractions, and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history

The post Bowe Bergdahl – An American Traitor appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

A Protection Racket Wrapped in a Cover-up

Sat, 11/18/2017 - 3:45pm

Is the entire Mueller investigation a false flag distraction to cover the tracks of the people who really did attempt to undermine an American presidential election?

Some background to this part of the plot must include the fact that the former FBI Director James Comey has admitted to illegally leaking transcripts of privileged conversations with the President to the press.  Why did he do it?  Comey testified before a Senate Committee that he orchestrated the leak of accounts of conversations with President Donald Trump because he thought it might lead to the appointment of a special prosecutor to lead the Russia investigation.

In an interesting twist Deputy Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein in a memo to the President on May 9, 2017 after outlining the improper actions of James Comey with regard to the investigation of Hillary’s emails stated, “Although the President has the power to remove an FBI director, the decision should not be taken lightly. I agree with the nearly unanimous opinions of former Department officials. The way the Director handled the conclusion of the email investigation was wrong. As a result, the FBI is unlikely to regain public and congressional trust until it has a Director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them. Having refused to admit his errors, the Director cannot be expected to implement the necessary corrective actions.”

Accepting this counsel President Trump fired FBI Director Comey.  Then Deputy Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein appointed Mueller as Special Counsel to investigate Trump based on his firing of Comey.

President Trump knows what’s going on.  In his famous tweet where he labeled Mueller’s fishing expedition a “Witch Hunt” he said “I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director!”

Mueller, who is up to his eyeballs in Hillary’s Russian scams, has weaponized criminal law in the convoluted attempt of the Progressive cult to misdirect the public.  The denizens of the swamp never expected Hillary to lose.  They never thought there was any chance of their nefarious and perhaps treasonous schemes to stack the deck and short circuit the electoral processes.  But in a shocking twist the electoral system designed by our founders worked and the united people out here in fly-over country were able to thwart the bi-coastal fix when the fix was supposedly in.

The gators, mosquitos, and apes of the swamp couldn’t abide this travesty.  So, the impartial Justice Department stepped in to claw back the reins of power from the great unwashed masses attempting to stage a revolution through the ballot box.   According to an analysis by The Hill, of the fourteen major federal agencies whose employees personally donated to presidential politics, “By the end of September 2016, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign.”  And an astounding ninety-four percent of DOJ employee donations were to Hillary.   Nothing to see here, no bias there, move along.

So far Mueller and his team of democrat donors have secured the indictment of Paul Manafort whose main crime may have been working in the Trump campaign.  Wait a minute how can you say that!  He wasn’t indicted for anything to do with Trump’s campaign.  No, he was indicted for tax fraud and lobbying violations.  Of course with the twisted and murky tax code that stretches to 73,954 pages.   Then again as the old saying concerning Grand Juries goes “Prosecutors could get them to indict a ham sandwich.”

As in any over-regulated state everyone is guilty of something they just haven’t decided to pick you up yet.  Let’s see if we give an ex-FBI chief an unlimited budget, a big Democrat donor staff, and our bewildering multitude of laws in America, they’ll eventually get anyone they want to much like a policeman following you for 1,000 miles.  Eventually he will find a reason to pull you over.

It isn’t even just a question of is this fair?  It comes down to a decision.  Is this the type of legal system we want in America?   Do we want to have the banana-republic type of kangaroo justice that indicts, arrests, and convicts people over their politics?

The information of Hillary and her minions in the State Department and the FBI regarding their lucrative dealings with Russia and their machinations to deprive Bernie of any chance to win the primaries spill out like garbage from a ruptured plastic bag.  And all the while we have the spectacle of those implicated by real evidence directing an investigation that goes nowhere and proves nothing.

A protection racket wrapped in a cover-up is playing out every day in the screaming headlines and impassioned screeds of the on-air teleprompter readers of the Corporations Once Known as the Mainstream Media.  The only real questions left are:

Will the establishment succeed in casting out the interloper?

Will they reverse the 2016 election and expose that we have devolved from a representative republic operating on democratic principles into a functioning oligarchy disguised as a non-functional democracy.

And there are two other questions that rattle around in my mind:

Who would Putin rather have as the president a totally corrupt political hack that everyone knows is for sale or a self-made billionaire that no one can bribe, whose energy mantra is “Drill Baby Drill” and whose platform is America First?

And if the Russians hacked the election and Hillary won the popular vote whose side were they on?  Evidently even the smartest woman in the world didn’t understand how the Electoral College works maybe the Russians didn’t either?

Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion.  He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com  © 2017 Contact Dr. Owens [email protected]   Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens or visit Dr. Owens Amazon Page / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens

 

The post A Protection Racket Wrapped in a Cover-up appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

For Roy Moore, a Long History of Combat and Controversy

Sat, 11/18/2017 - 3:43pm

GADSDEN, Ala. — It was 1982, and four circuit judges from rural Etowah County, Ala., had filed a state bar complaint against a lawyer named Roy S. Moore, accusing him of running “slanderous” political ads that had portrayed the local legal system as corrupt.

The response from the 35-year-old Mr. Moore, who had just lost his own effort to win a judgeship, was infused with the kind of crusading righteousness — his critics would call it sanctimony — that would later fuel his rise to national fame.

“If the judges of Etowah County are personally offended, that is their problem, not mine,” he declared in a letter addressing the judges’ complaint. Mr. Moore added a line from Proverbs: “The guilty flee when no man pursueth.”

Today, rather than flee, or at least quit his race for the Senate, as many are demanding, Mr. Moore is declaring his innocence and charging ahead despite allegations of improper sexual behavior.

The current furor, in which numerous women have come forward alleging that he approached, dated, or in some cases sexually assaulted them when they were teenagers and he was in his 30s, has played out like a concentrated version of Mr. Moore’s combative history, in which he rose to national prominence as an unyielding spokesman for conservative and religious values.

Mr. Moore, a Republican, has responded with the same defiance that he exhibited when he was twice removed from his post as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, first for dismissing a federal court order to remove a 5,280-pound granite monument of the Ten Commandments he had installed in the state judicial building, and later for flouting the United States Supreme Court’s decision affirming gay marriage. For good measure, he has declared that homosexuality should be illegal, and that Muslims should not be allowed to serve in Congress.

A Reputation Develops

Mr. Moore first made a name for himself as a prosecutor and an anti-establishment political outsider here in Gadsden in the years after 1977, when he returned to Etowah County after an education at West Point, a tour of duty in Vietnam and law school in Tuscaloosa. He already had the contentiousness, if not the overt religiosity.

During those years, he was developing another reputation, passed along in whispers. Now they have grown to a roar, threatening to derail what might have been a cakewalk political contest in deeply conservative Alabama.

“It was a known fact: Roy Moore liked young girls,” said Faye Gary, a retired Gadsden police officer. “It was treated like a joke. That’s just the way it was.”

One of the women, Leigh Corfman, said she was 14 years old when Mr. Moore engaged in a sexual encounter with her. “I stand by my story,” said Ms. Corfman, whose account first appeared in The Washington Post. Mr. Moore has denied any impropriety with Ms. Corfman or any other woman.

Quick to Rock the Boat

After coming home, Mr. Moore landed a job as an assistant district attorney. M. D. Garmon, a former reporter for The Gadsden Times, remembered him as eager to shake things up. “He didn’t want to be in the clique of judges and the attorneys apparently,” Mr. Garmon said. “He was sort of standoffish to them, which in turn affected their treatment of him.”

Mr. Moore was rarely seen in the places where lawyers would routinely gather to swap gossip, said James Sledge, a former federal judge who was a lawyer at the time. Few remember him out and about socially. He is, however, remembered as a common presence at the Y.M.C.A. and the Gadsden Mall.

As with everything concerning Mr. Moore, accounts vary. Alice Bircheat, the longtime bookkeeper at the Y.M.C.A., said that she recalled “not one complaint” about Mr. Moore. Terry White, 70, a former Gadsden police officer who worked security at the mall, said, “Nobody, as far as I know, ever complained.”

Myron K. Allenstein, a local lawyer who rented office space to Mr. Moore and later tried cases with him, insisted that Mr. Moore was a man of unimpeachable character. “He’s real down to earth but feels real strongly about what he believes,” he said. Mr. Allenstein noted that he was a Democrat who planned to vote for Mr. Moore in the Dec. 12 election.

But numerous people remembered otherwise. They recalled Mr. Moore working out at the Y.M.C.A. gym, often shirtless. Delores Abney, 63, said she recalled Mr. Moore talking to women that “appeared to be high school on up” in an exercise class she was enrolled in. “It just did not look appropriate.”

Janet Reeves, 57, a former employee of a photo kiosk and an Orange Julius at the mall, talked of Mr. Moore asking a friend of hers, who she recalled was 17 or 18, for her phone number. “I just thought he was the creepy old guy,” she said.

Glenn Day, 64, who managed two stores at the mall in those years, recalled that Mr. Moore had such reputation for approaching young women that the mall guard asked him to let security know whenever he saw Mr. Moore there. “I can’t believe there’s such an outcry now,” Mr. Day said, “about something everybody knew.”

Mr. Moore declined to comment. In a campaign message Friday evening, he said the allegations were part of a plot by liberals and certain Republicans, which “shows how much the establishment flat-out hates our conservative Christian values.”

In his 2005 memoir, “So Help Me God,” Mr. Moore described his battles with the local establishment, and acknowledged that it made him enemies. He criticized laws that let criminals out for “good time” served, the bail bond system, and planned budget cuts to the sheriff’s department. He sued the county when it declined him raises he was due. He was rocking the boat, he wrote, “and none of the other passengers seemed happy.”

People who grew up with him suggest his polarizing reputation goes back further than his days as a county prosecutor.

“He was very bright,” said Janet Hinton, who was two years behind Mr. Moore in high school. She remembered him coming from a poor family that struggled to get by. He was also, she said, “known as a real bragger who acted like the smartest person in the classroom.”

Twenty years later, he was inspiring some of the same strong feelings, alienating much of the Gadsden legal community and provoking local judges to take the rare step of filing bar complaints against him. (The complaints were eventually closed without action being taken.) An unsuccessful run for county judge in 1982, though giving voters a taste of the hard-line populism that would later draw a national fan base, only seemed to leave him more isolated.

Bill Willard, a longtime lawyer here, ventured a theory. He pointed out that Mr. Moore had never seemed to have any kind of social life, certainly not among his professional peers. And the current allegations, he said, could be seen in that context.

“He was really immature socially,” Mr. Willard said of Mr. Moore’s reputed attraction to teenagers, “and so it might kind of make sense.”

Read More: MSN.com

The post For Roy Moore, a Long History of Combat and Controversy appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge

Fri, 11/17/2017 - 4:35pm
Gloria Allred is a highly accomplished, if controversial, lawyer who is admired — or reviled — for her sensational representation of women who are alleged victims of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Yet on Wednesday she committed a major blunder when she declined a public invitation by the attorney representing Roy Moore, Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Alabama, to have a key piece of evidence examined by independent experts.

Earlier that afternoon, attorney Phillip L. Jauregui questioned some of the claims by Allred’s client, Beverly Young Nelson, who emerged Monday to accuse Moore of sexual assault several decades ago. In particular, Jauregui said that Nelson’s claim that she had no subsequent contact with Moore was false, because he had adjudicated her divorce in 1999. And he challenged a signature in Nelson’s high school yearbook that she claimed was Moore’s.

Jauregui noted that handwriting experts “can’t look at a copy on the Internet … they’ve got to look at an original.” He demanded that Allred release the yearbook to a “neutral custodian” so that a “professional expert” could examine it to determine whether the signature was genuine — or, as he contended, a “fraud.” He said that Allred would be free to send her own handwriting expert to examine the yearbook and the signature for herself.

Allred then called into CNN, reaching Wolf Blitzer live on The Situation Room. She said that she would be willing to submit the yearbook to “an independent expert or experts” — but only once her client and Moore had testified under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics before the election. She would not agree to have the yearbook examined otherwise, claiming “we’re not going to be distracted.”

That was a major mistake. By trying to use the yearbook — the critical piece of evidence in establishing Nelson’s credibility — as leverage to force a Senate hearing before the election, Allred seemed to put politics ahead of the truth. Worse, she opened herself and her client to questions about whether they have something to hide. Whatever the truth of Jauregui’s claims that the yearbook signature is a “fraud,” Allred lent those claims greater credibility.

Allred also gave Moore’s supporters a reason to stand behind him. It will be difficult, at best, to discover what really happened three or four decades ago. All the public can rely on is the credibility of Moore and his accusers today. And while Moore has given inconsistent answers, all he needs to do to survive until Election Day is to create some doubt about the allegations. Allred gave him that opportunity — to the detriment of her client and other accusers.

Source:  JOEL B. POLLAK @Breitbart.com

 

The post Gloria Allred’s Blunder on Roy Moore’s Yearbook Challenge appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Ex-Google exec on his artificial intelligence church: What is created ‘will effectively be a god’

Fri, 11/17/2017 - 4:18am
Anthony Levandowski, a former Google executive, has plans to create an entire religion — complete with a physical place of worship — based on artificial intelligence. Sorry, what?

According to an interview published on Thursday in Wired titled, “Inside the First Church of Artificial Intelligence,” Levandowski discusses the concept, which he’s dubbed “Way of the Future.”

The gospel of the religion would be called “The Manual,” and Levandowski forsees building a physical place of worship for parishioners to worship the religion’s deity — artificial intelligence.

Wired reported that Levandowski is so intent on cultivating the religion that he and others have gone as far as to file paperwork with the IRS in order to solidify plans for the organization.

Levandowski himself would, of course, be leader — or in this case “dean” — of the religion.

According to Wired, the religion’s activities will focus on “the realization, acceptance, and worship of a Godhead based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) developed through computer hardware and software.”

The church will perform outreach to AI industry leaders and professionals to network with those “who are interested in the worship of a Godhead based on AI.”

Levandowski spoke about the religion with what sounded like a fervor.

“What is going to be created will effectively be a god,” he said. “It’s not a god in the sense that it makes lightning or causes hurricanes. But if there is something a billion times smarter than the smartest human, what else are you going to call it?”

He added, “I would love for the machine to see us as its beloved elders that it respects and takes care of. We would want this intelligence to say, ‘Humans should still have rights, even though I’m in charge.’”

Later in the interview, Levandowski compared the religion to other major religions of the world.

“There are many ways people think of God, and thousands of flavors of Christianity, Judaism, Islam,” he explained. “But they’re always looking at something that’s not measurable or you can’t really see or control. This time it’s different. This time you will be able to talk to God, literally, and know that it’s listening.”

Source: Sarah Taylor @TheBlaze.com

The post Ex-Google exec on his artificial intelligence church: What is created ‘will effectively be a god’ appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

BREAKING: House passes GOP tax reform bill

Thu, 11/16/2017 - 9:48pm

The first step was taken in getting tax reform pushed through on Thursday, as Republicans in the House passed the tax reform legislation that promises to make tax reporting so simple it can be done on a postcard.

The bill was passed in a 227-205 vote, despite 13 House Republicans voting against it. The GOP received more votes than necessary; they could have lost up to 22 votes from their own party and still passed the bill.

Republicans have promised that the new tax bill will reduce rates for individuals, corporations and small businesses.

Representative Devin Nunes, R-Calif., a member of the Ways and Means Committee who helped write the plan, said, “For the first time in 31 years, we are wiping the tax code clean and replacing it with one that is fairer and simpler for everyone.”

The bill now faces an uphill battle in the Senate, as three Republican senators have already said they might oppose it, which would effectively kill the bill.

Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) have both stated they might not support it, and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has said with certainty he will not be voting for it.

“We’ve got a long road ahead of us, and we’ve got a timeline to get this done before the end of the year,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said Thursday.

The contents of the bill are expected to change, however. The Senate is in the process of writing its own tax bill, which lawmakers will vote on after the Thanksgiving recess, GOP leaders said. If that can pass, a House-Senate conference would meet to sort out the differences.

House Republican leaders on Thursday touted their bill as one that would boost the middle class. A family of four earning $59,000 annually would receive a tax cut of nearly $1,200, they calculated.

Source: DMLnews.com

The post BREAKING: House passes GOP tax reform bill appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Liberals Exhibit a Pathology of Deception

Thu, 11/16/2017 - 10:52am

How do I conclude liberalism is a pathology based on deception?

After being reminded about the TV series Columbo in 2011, I begin asking detective style questions to try to understand why liberals were posting peculiar patterns of debate I had been seeing in thousands of social media and live debates. It was NOT stupidity, like many people claimed. Why do they strongly avoid all supporting evidence for liberal policy failure and conservative policy success?

I first studied psychology articles about how to catch people being dishonest, and how to expose people, the “tell” articles of deception.

Then, I watched a lot of TV detective shows to see what actors use to expose deceitful actors in guilty roles. These “tells” would be the things everyday people understand, like behavior markers poker players watch for in opponents. And they would HAVE to be ”normal” because actors and writers are making a movie script for everyday people. (Many liberals like to mock the movie industry reference – but it is fake mockery, and they know it. It is critical an actor exhibits typical behaviors, or else the audience would be lost. Duh.)

Finally, I ran my list of tactics of deception behavior past some detectives I know.

Using three sources of information, completely independent, the same answers were consistent about how to spot deceptive behaviors. There are 11 universal tactics humans employ.

Then I spent two years asking liberals questions to see why they were answering the way they were. I begin to see the brilliant liberals exhibit the same evasive behaviors as far less educated liberals – common points of appearance of evasions, insults, and “disappearing” from debates at the same times – always when it came time to ponder pro-conservative ideas – and after I let them say their ideas first and displayed empathy to them, pleasing them immensely. Consistently, they didn’t have time or interest in Socratic, conservative logic or reason when it began to expose “best practices” were conservative ideas. They were not “open minded” as they claimed – exactly the opposite.

Even rather modestly smart people were suddenly genii about liberal policy, but begin to “act” stupid about conservative policy: Both brilliant college graduates, and high school educated liberal opponents exhibited the same “black out” of stupidity and ignorance when common Socratic justifications for conservative policy – for the Constitution itself – were presented.

Due to the multitude of deception markers liberals exhibited, not just 1, this pointed to fake stupidity being employed actively in debate, by liberals. They are hiding truth, consistently.

Prevaricating.

John D. Lofgren @ Junto Club: www.atlasShouts.com

Author of “Atlas Shouts”  #13 rated Money book on Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Atlas-Shouts-Modern-Patriot-Action/dp/1458217566

Atlas Shouts, The Movie:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrPgka9SBJ4

The post Liberals Exhibit a Pathology of Deception appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Sexual Assault Moore or Less

Tue, 11/14/2017 - 10:30pm

Sexual assault Moore or less seems to be the order of the day. Now, before the liberals and SOME republicans get on their soapbox and call me a pervert I’d like to point out a few simple facts. First off, isn’t it handy that no one had any problems until Roy Moore ran for the senate. All these forty years or so the offended had a collective brain fart and went merrily about their business. Roy did all them horrible things and Nobody told mommy, a cop, a priest or even the cat, but the very second it looked like Moore was about to be a senator they all came out of the woodwork with soiled panties. Let’s do some math. Uh, fourteen plus forty equals a GRANDMOTHER!

Now just what would you call a woman like that? Well, that would be a whore. Swat them bees. Liberals. Bill Clinton’s escapades in the White House didn’t bother them. Bruce Gender didn’t bother them. Enough dead babies to embarrass Hitler, and Hillary’s body count rivaling Vietnam, but some old lady claiming she was diddled some time in the last century screws then up. Sorry, bad choice of words.

Let’s talk about the senators saying they won’t allow Moore to be seated should he win. And they wonder why the south seceded! Save your Confederate money boys . . . wait, Confederate money is more solvent than the dollar. It doesn’t say Federal Reserve at the top. How are they gonna explain that to the voters. We already have a bunch of bull dykes dressed like vaginas screaming, “Not my president,” now what, not my senator?

This is the left’s continuing assault on America. They simply can’t understand that

Ben Shapiro’s take

it’s all over now, and it sure is Monday! The people spoke loud and clear with Trump and they’re about to speak again. We vote, they scream at the sky.

It has become fashionable to accuse men decades later. You will note that no gays are ever accused. They teach anal sex to six year olds. Now I’m going to really shock you. WhatEVER Roy Moore did he must’ve done it bad because his accusers took close to a half century to remember it.

The post Sexual Assault Moore or Less appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Virginia Election Determined by Angry Swamp Creatures

Mon, 11/13/2017 - 12:20pm

The Virginia off–year election for governor demonstrates what would have happened last year if the Constitution didn’t require an Electoral College.

Crony Conservative Ed Gillespie carried 82 counties compared to Democrat Ralph Northam’s 13. The 69–county advantage didn’t mean squat though. All that counted was Northam’s 230,853 vote margin that put him in the governor’s mansion.

I assumed that Gillespie’s loss was due to his tepid embrace of President Trump’s populism and a generally uninspiring campaign. Gillespie’s issues may have been a hit with focus groups, but in the real world the campaign landed with a thud.

Gillespie is as much a conservative as Elizabeth Warren is a Comanche. Jeb Bush may have been low energy, but Ed Gillespie was low emotion. When a candidate speaks conservatism as a second language it’s tough to be fluent discussing issues important to the base.

Unfortunately, the numbers don’t support my case for conservatives and Trumpistas rejecting our lobbyist–in–waiting. It’s hard to evaluate intensity since Virginia doesn’t register voters by party. And you can’t compare the 2013 primary to the 2017 primary because in 2013 Republicans held a convention.

Since the big issue for Democrats and the OpMedia was the so–called Trump effect, it makes sense to examine counties carried by the president. It appears many Virginia conservatives were more tolerant of Establishment Ed and his amnesty background than I was.

Ballotpedia identified five counties in Virginia it terms “pivot counties” because they voted for Obama in 2012 and Trump in 2016. These counties should be the home of swing voters and the type of voter Gillespie would have to hold to win. During the GOP primary the ineffectual but bombastic Corey Stewart won only two of the five counties, indicating swing voters found Enervating Ed an acceptable candidate.

In the general election Gillespie again carried all five of the “pivot counties.” In three his margin was less than Trump’s, but in the other two his margin exceeded Trump’s. Analyst Jim Crumley contends it was Gillespie’s failure to turn out the Trump vote that cost him the election. I disagree. Gillespie got 66 percent of the Trump voters to go to the polls in an off–year election, which is very good when you consider overall voter turnout was only 47 percent.

What beat Gillespie was the remarkable 71 percent of the Hillary voters that Democrats turned out. Then if Gillespie’s loss wasn’t due to conservative turnoff, what was the cause? Simple, this election was the revenge of the swamp creatures. Republicans in the House of Delegates lost a shocking 14 seats and a stunning 11 of those losers were incumbents.

Looking at a color–coded map of the state by legislative district makes my case. All but one of the flipped seats were either in the suburbs of Washington, DC; the government installation–heavy Norfolk area, government–centric Richmond and isolated Communist cells in the university towns of Lynchburg, Roanoke and Blacksburg.

A combination of Big Government and Big Dependency helped the swamp break through the levee and inundate neighboring House of Delegates’ districts. Government pounded the governed.

And who can blame them? Trump has targeted Big Government from his first days in office. It’s a public–spirited swamp creature indeed who would vote for the party of the man who claims to be draining their habitat.

In February of last year — at the time I was on Cruz Control — I wrote a column about the best reason I’d seen so far to vote for Trump. A GovExec.com poll claimed that up to 25 percent of the federal workforce would consider quitting if Trump were elected.

It proved to be just another Big Government lie, but the survey was a useful indicator of attitude. The federal workforce and its various hangers on that include contractors, NGOs, lobbyists, handout seekers and crony capitalists see an unprecedented threat to their livelihood if Trump is successful. That fear and OpMedia–fed loathing led to an unprecedented negative, straight–ticket vote against Republicans.

They didn’t so much vote their pocketbooks as they voted to keep draining yours.

The question for Democrats is can they replicate this success in the 2018 mid–term elections? I’m doubtful. Metro can only export so many federal workers and camp followers to the surrounding DC suburbs. And it’s a cinch Trump isn’t planning to go on a nationwide federal hiring frenzy so he can send more Democrats to the polls.

That doesn’t mean Democrats won’t win by other means. If the Republican Keystone Kongress — the Gang That Couldn’t Govern Straight — doesn’t pass meaningful tax reform or repeal Obamacare; but does pass amnesty for DACA invaders, I predict a wipeout.

One in which I will gladly participate.

The post Virginia Election Determined by Angry Swamp Creatures appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

God Bless America?

Sun, 11/12/2017 - 12:52pm

God Bless America? From Utah Raging to a salute to our vets this has been a week to remember. The hardest thing about being a

Are the lambs still screaming Clairice?

writer these days is picking a subject from the many cropping up each day. I never thought I’d see the day when some slut flipping off the president became the lead story of the day. America is gone, and it’s not coming back!

I know now why I’m a Texas secessionist. North Korea can’t bomb America. They don’t have enough bombs. It would take Russia, China and all the other countries to just disinfect This place. . Usually I try to provide a solution, but I don’t have one for this. God Bless America? When Obama became president and the liberals held sway for eight years the nation went mad. Men married men, little boys became girls and we had a dead baby in every pot. God Bless America? God damned America and caught the last train for the coast.

Well, we’re stuck with it. We have GOT to make it better. ANTIFA needs to be killed off right along with Black Lives Matter. Does that shock you? That was politically incorrect huh? But it’s true. We have to figure this out or it will end us all. It’s wrong to allow men to marry men. It’s wrong to have someone like Ellen Degenerate on TV where our children can see. It is wrong to allow news services to constantly insult our president and his family. We have to take America back and rid it of all these Neanderthals who have been beating us over the head for eight years, and then maybe, just maybe God WILL Bless America again. Either that it make Putin president. Wait! That’s not such a bad idea.

The Best Is Yet To Come

Jesus is the Ultimate Psychologist

The Public School System

ANTIFA Is The Problem! Not Church, Not Guns!

These Were Bad Men and The Whores Weren’t Ladies Pt II

Utah Raging

 

The post God Bless America? appeared first on Tea Party Tribune.

Pages

Donate to Tea Party Manatee





Follow us on social media

Upcoming Events

About

If you have Constitutional values, believe in fiscal restraint, limited government, and a free market economy - then join us or just come and listen to one of our excellent speakers. We meet every Tuesday from 6-8 pm at Mixon Fruit Farms in the Honeybell Hall, 2525 27th St. East, Bradenton, Florida. Map it

Tea Party Manatee welcomes all like-minded Americans.

Our core values are:

  • Defend the Constitution
  • Fiscal Responsibility
  • Limited Government
  • Free Markets
  • God and Country

Read more