Back to Top

Feed aggregator

What’s funnier than handsy Joe Biden going to bat for women? His plagiarizing in plain view

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 2:13pm

But there is something genuinely curious about this manifesto, and that is its length. The article runs 11,347 words, raising the question of when he had time to write it. An even more salient question is why the article, which carries Biden's byline, refers to him throughout in the third person. The opening sentence for example reads:

The post What’s funnier than handsy Joe Biden going to bat for women? His plagiarizing in plain view appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Donald Trump Is No Ronald Reagan

Center for Freedom and Prosperity (CF&P) - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 12:39pm

Way back in January of 2017, I predicted for a French TV audience that Donald Trump would be a big spender like George Bush instead of a small-government conservative like Ronald Reagan.

Sadly, I was right.

crunched the numbers earlier this year and showed that Trump has been a big spender, no matter how the data is sliced.

Perhaps most shocking, he’s even allowed domestic spending to increase faster than it did under Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama.

That’s a terrible track record, especially compared to Reagan’s impressive performance (by the way, these calculations were made before all the coronavirus-related spending, so updated numbers would make Trump look even worse by comparison).

Anyhow, I’m looking at this issue today because of a recent story in the Washington Post.

The Reagan Foundation just told the Trump people to stop using the Gipper’s likeness in their fundraising appeals.

The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, which runs the 40th president’s library near Los Angeles, has demanded that President Trump and the Republican National Committee (RNC) quit raising campaign money by using Ronald Reagan’s name and likeness. …What came to the foundation’s attention — and compelled officials there to complain — was a fundraising email that went out July 19… The solicitation offered, for a donation of $45 or more, a “limited edition” commemorative set featuring two gold-colored coins, one with an image of Reagan and one with an image of Trump. …Proceeds from the coin sales went to the Trump Make America Great Again Committee, a joint fundraising operation that benefits both the Trump campaign and the RNC. …In the 1990s, both Reagan and his wife Nancy signed legal documents that granted the foundation sole rights to their names, likenesses and images. …the RNC accepted the foundation’s demand regarding the fundraising emails.

It’s unclear why the Reagan Foundation made the request.

For what it’s worth, I hope officials were motivated at least in part by disappointment with Trump’s anti-conservative record on government spending (and also on trade).

Simply stated, Trump is no Reagan.

While I’m a big fan of the Gipper, I don’t pretend he had a perfect track record. But I think it’s correct to say that his goal was to advance liberty by shrinking government, even if there were occasional detours.

For instance, Holman Jenkins noted in his Wall Street Journal column that Reagan always had the right long-run goals even when he made short-run comprises on trade that were unfortunate.

Reagan slapped import quotas on cars, motorcycles, forklifts, memory chips, color TVs, machine tools, textiles, steel, Canadian lumber and mushrooms. There was no market meltdown. Donald Trump hit foreign steel and aluminum, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 600 points… The real difference is that Reagan’s protectionist devices were negotiated. They were acts of cartel creation… This was unattractive but it wasn’t a disaster, and Reagan’s protectionism quickly fell away when a global upswing began. …Mr. Trump wants a spectacle with himself at the center. …His confused and misguided ideas about trade are one of his few long and deeply held policy commitments.

And if you need more evidence, look at what Reagan said about trade herehere, and here.

Can you imagine Trump giving such remarks? Or even understanding the underlying principles?

There are also important differences in the populism of Trump and Reagan, as explained by Jonah Goldberg of the American Enterprise Institute.

…there are different kinds of conservative populism. Until recently, right-wing populism manifested itself in the various forms of the tea party, which emphasized limited government and fiscal restraint. That populism…is very different from Trump’s version. …Reagan’s themes and rhetoric were decidedly un-Trumpian. The conservative populist who delivered “A Time for Choosing” used broadly inclusive language, focusing his ire at a centralized government that reduced a nation of aspiring individuals to “the masses.” …Reagan’s populist rhetoric was informed by a moderate, big-hearted temperament, a faith in American exceptionalism… He warned of concentrated power that corrodes self-government.

I’ll close with the observation that Trump has enacted some good policies, especially with regard to taxes and red tape.

The bottom line is that I’m not trying to convince anyone to vote for Trump or to vote against Trump.

Instead, I simply want people to be consistent and principled advocates of economic liberty instead of blind partisans.

As explained in my Ninth Theorem of Government.

In other words, I don’t care if you’re an enthusiastic supporter of Trump. Just don’t let that support lead you to somehow rationalize that wasteful spending and protectionism are somehow good ideas.

And I don’t care if you’re an enthusiastic never-Trumper. Just don’t let that hostility lead you to somehow decide that tax cuts and deregulation are bad ideas.

P.S. In my speeches over the past few years, I’ve run into many people who tell me that Trump must be good because the media hates him the same way they hated Reagan. It’s certainly true that the establishment press has visceral disdain for both of them. I’ll simply point out that media hostility is a necessary but not sufficient condition for determining whether a Republican believes in smaller government.

Woman torches SUV, resulting explosion blows up in her face

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 11:11am

The justice nature delivered was every bit as sweet as that in other dramas that have been playing out.

The post Woman torches SUV, resulting explosion blows up in her face appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

George Mason University may discriminate based on race in unconstitutional ways

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 11:05am

Kendi’s claim ignores the fact that many racial disparities are not caused by racism. For example, Latinos live three years longer than whites, on average, even though doctors don’t discriminate in their favor. Asians make more money than whites, on average. And while blacks make less money than whites, on average, immigrants from African countries like Nigeria actually make more money than whites do.

The post George Mason University may discriminate based on race in unconstitutional ways appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Cartoon of the Day: Pawn Stars

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 10:45am


The post Cartoon of the Day: Pawn Stars appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

America isn’t a racist country

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 10:15am

Ward Connerly, WSJ

The post America isn’t a racist country appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Radio host claims Seattle is peaceful, comes home to find his apartment complex trashed by protesters

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 9:30am

This time, the former skeptic turned true believer is the memorably named Paul Gallant, a radio host operating out of war-torn Seattle. But Gallant's transformation is even more of a thing of beauty since in June he trolled Donald Trump for having called out the violent anarachists who had descended on the Emerald City.

The post Radio host claims Seattle is peaceful, comes home to find his apartment complex trashed by protesters appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech

Liberty Unyielding - Mon, 07/27/2020 - 8:39am

Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe

The post Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Mask nazi maces a couple picnicking in a park because ‘they weren’t wearing face masks’

Liberty Unyielding - Sun, 07/26/2020 - 1:52pm

Who needs police when you have irate citizens patrolling our cities to make sure the rest of the citizenry and staying in line? Of course, that strategy didn’t end too well for a Brooklyn woman who chastised some hooligans setting off fireworks in the presence of young children and was shot to death for her […]

The post Mask nazi maces a couple picnicking in a park because ‘they weren’t wearing face masks’ appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

Democratic Socialism Doesn’t Work Any Better than Totalitarian Socialism

Center for Freedom and Prosperity (CF&P) - Sun, 07/26/2020 - 12:27pm

When I write about socialism, I often point out that there’s a difference between how economists define it (government ownershipcentral planning, and price controls) and how normal people define it (lots of taxes, redistribution, and intervention).

These definitions are blurry, of course, which is why I created a “socialism slide” to show how countries oftentimes are an odd mix of markets and government.

But one thing that isn’t blurry is the evidence on what works. Simply stated, there is less prosperity in nations with big government compared to nations with small government.

And it doesn’t matter whether socialism is the result of democracy or tyranny.

Kristian Niemietz is with the Institute of Economic Affairs in London. He explained for CapX that mixing democracy with socialism doesn’t fix anything.

Mention the economic failures of the former Eastern Bloc countries, or Maoist China, or North Vietnam, or today, of Cuba or Venezuela or North Korea, and the answer will invariably be: “But that was a dictatorship! That’s got nothing to do with me, I’m a democratic socialist!” …“[S]ocialism means ‘economic democracy’… But the…economic failures of socialism never had anything to do with a lack of democracy. Democratisation improves many things, and is desirable for many reasons. But it does not, in and of itself, make countries richer. …The empirical literature on this subject finds no relationship either way between economic development, and the system of government. …If socialists want to make the case that democracy was the magic missing ingredient… How exactly would democracy have closed the economic gap between East and West Germany, or North and South Korea, or Cuba and Puerto Rico, or Maoist China and Taiwan, or the People’s Republic of Angola and Botswana, or Venezuela and Chile?

Meanwhile, Kevin Williamson pointed out in National Review that post-war socialism in the United Kingdom failed for the same reason that socialism fails anywhere and everywhere it is tried.

History counsels us to consider the first adjective in “democratic socialist” with some skepticism. …the socialism that reduced the United Kingdom from world power to intermittently pre-industrial backwater in the post-war era was thoroughly democratic. …In the United States, we use the word “democratic” as though it were a synonym for “decent” or “accountable,” but 51 percent of the people can wreck a country just as easily and as thoroughly as 10 percent of them. …The problems of socialism are problems of socialism — problems related to the absence of markets, innovation, and free enterprise… Socialism and authoritarianism often go hand in hand (almost always, in fact), but socialism on its own, even when it is the result of democratic elections and genuinely democratic processes, is a bottomless well of misery. …rights — property rights and the right to trade prominent among them — also find themselves on the wrong side of majorities, constantly and predictably. But they are…necessary for a thriving and prosperous society. Socialism destroys societies by gutting or diminishing those rights. Doing so with the blessing of 50 percent plus one of the population does not make that any less immoral or any less corrosive.

Thankfully, Margaret Thatcher saved the United Kingdom from socialism.

But other nations haven’t been so lucky. Democratically elected governments adopted socialism in Greece and Argentina, but neither country found a savior to restore economic liberty (or maybe voters didn’t want to reverse the failed policies).

What about the United States? Will we vote ourselves into socialism?

Given the wretched track records of WilsonHooverFDRNixonObama, etc, I’m tempted to say that we’ve been doing that for more than 100 years.

But I don’t want to be unduly pessimistic. America hasn’t slid too far down the socialism slide. Indeed, we’re actually ranked #6 in the world for economic liberty.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that there are lots of proposals for additional bad policy and plenty of politicians clamoring to move in the wrong direction.

To see what that might mean, I’ll close with some polling data that the Washington Examiner shared earlier this year. Here are things that might happen if socialists (however defined) get power in the United States.

And here are things that the American people say would qualify as socialism.

Ugh, that’s a recipe for the Venezuela-fication of the U.S. economy.

P.S. For what it’s worth, notwithstanding his statist platform, I think Joe Biden only intends to incrementally go down the slide (whereas Bernie Sanders would have greased the slide for a rapid descent).

Pelosi has a ‘clever’ new nickname for Trump

Liberty Unyielding - Sun, 07/26/2020 - 12:10pm

About the kindest thing that can be said about Pelosi is that she has revealed another 'talent' — something that she is just about as good at as being House Speaker.

The post Pelosi has a ‘clever’ new nickname for Trump appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.

To BLM or not to BLM: NBC Sports appoints itself the arbiter of what it means to be Christian

Liberty Unyielding - Sun, 07/26/2020 - 11:29am

Other than his use of like as a conjunction, I can't find a blessed thing wrong with what Coonrod said.

The post To BLM or not to BLM: NBC Sports appoints itself the arbiter of what it means to be Christian appeared first on Liberty Unyielding.


Subscribe to Tea Party Manatee aggregator

Donate to Tea Party Manatee

Follow us on social media


If you have Constitutional values, believe in fiscal restraint, limited government, and a free market economy - then join us or just come and listen to one of our excellent speakers. We meet every Tuesday from 6-8 pm at Mixon Fruit Farms in the Honeybell Hall, 2525 27th St. East, Bradenton, Florida. Map it

Tea Party Manatee welcomes all constitution loving Americans.

Our core values are:

  • Defend the Constitution
  • Fiscal Responsibility
  • Limited Government
  • Free Markets
  • God and Country

Read more